Insight Report
Best Lunches After a Gym Session
Higher-protein post-workout lunches to support recovery.
Last updated: 7 June 2026157 products analysed
Top 10 ranked
| Rank | Product | Brand | Score /100 | Calories (kcal) | Protein (g) | Fibre (g) | Sugar (g) | Salt (g) | Watch-outs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Rainbow Bowl | Nandos | 94 | 650 | 42.0 | 12.0 | 8.0 | 0.7 | - |
| 2 |  Spicy Chicken Zhoug Wrap | LEON | 89 | 479 | 29.0 | 4.0 | 6.9 | 1.8 | - |
| 3 |  Grilled Chicken Burger | Nandos | 88 | 443 | 34.8 | 3.4 | 4.6 | 1.9 | Salt high |
| 4 |  Hot-Smoked Salmon, Lime & Jalapeño | LEON | 88 | 494 | 26.0 | 6.9 | 7.1 | 2.1 | Salt high |
| 5 |  Chicken Tikka | Subway | 85 | 302 | 26.0 | 3.5 | 6.0 | 1.2 | - |
| 6 |  BBQ Chicken & Bacon Pasta | Greggs | 85 | 487 | 26.0 | N/A | 8.8 | 1.2 | Fibre n/a |
| 7 |  Tuna Crunch Baguette | Greggs | 85 | 413 | 26.0 | N/A | 7.6 | 1.5 | Fibre n/a |
| 8 |  Tandoori Chicken Baguette | Greggs | 85 | 459 | 25.0 | N/A | 7.1 | 1.6 | Fibre n/a |
| 9 |  Chicken Butterfly | Nandos | 84 | 331 | 59.3 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.3 | - |
| 10 |  Grilled Chicken Wrap | Nandos | 84 | 556 | 36.8 | 5.5 | 17.5 | 1.9 | Salt high |
About this ranking
Methodology summary
The Healthier Score is a nutrition-based comparison score using published per-portion nutrition data.
Calories
15%
Protein
20%
Fibre
15%
Sugar
12%
Salt
18%
Sat fat
15%
Scores are combined using weighted averages. High levels of salt or saturated fat can cap the final score.
View full methodology →Watch-out key
- Salt highAbove 1.8g salt per serving
- Sat fat highAbove 5g saturated fat
- Fibre n/aFibre data not provided
- Score cappedScore reduced due to salt or sat fat
Brand breakdown
Number of top 10 appearances
- Nandos4
- Greggs3
- LEON2
- Subway1
Related insights
- More coming soon.
Important
The Healthier Score is not medical advice. It is a nutrition-based comparison score only. Always check the restaurant's latest nutrition, ingredients and allergen information before ordering.
Data caveats
Nutrition data is provided by restaurant brands and may change over time. Fibre is not always published. Where missing, a conservative fibre score is used.