Insight Report
Top 10 Best Meals for a Balanced Lunch
Lunch options with solid protein, fibre and controlled salt and calories, ranked by Healthier Score.
Top 10 ranked
| Rank | Product | Brand | Score /100 | Calories (kcal) | Protein (g) | Fibre (g) | Sugar (g) | Salt (g) | Watch-outs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rainbow Bowl | Nandos | 94 | 650 | 42.0 | 12.0 | 8.0 | 0.7 | - |
| 2 | chicken katsu with katsu curry sauce | wagamama | 90 | 426 | 21.8 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 0.6 | - |
| 3 | Falafel Rice Box | LEON | 87 | 393 | 15.0 | 9.5 | 11.0 | 1.5 | - |
| 4 | Tuna & Cucumber | pret | 86 | 379 | 18.5 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 1.4 | - |
| 5 | Chicken Tikka | Subway | 85 | 302 | 26.0 | 3.5 | 6.0 | 1.2 | - |
| 6 | Chargrilled Chicken Rice Box | LEON | 85 | 382 | 21.0 | 3.6 | 9.2 | 1.4 | - |
| 7 | Chicken & Avocado Superfood Salad | LEON | 78 | 601 | 27.0 | 8.2 | 11.0 | 1.5 | Sat fat highScore capped |
| 8 | The Original Superfood Salad | LEON | 78 | 494 | 19.0 | 12.0 | 6.2 | 1.4 | Sat fat highScore capped |
| 9 | Kids' Pizza Toastie | pret | 78 | 379 | 16.9 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 1.4 | Sat fat highScore capped |
About this ranking
Filters: lunch occasion, 15g+ protein, 3g+ fibre, salt at or below 1.5g, calories at or below 700.
Methodology summary
The Healthier Score is a nutrition-based comparison score using published per-portion nutrition data.
Scores are combined using weighted averages. High levels of salt or saturated fat can cap the final score.
View full methodology →Watch-out key
- Salt highAbove 1.8g salt per serving
- Sat fat highAbove 5g saturated fat
- Fibre n/aFibre data not provided
- Score cappedScore reduced due to salt or sat fat
Brand breakdown
Number of top 10 appearances
- LEON4
- pret2
- Nandos1
- wagamama1
- Subway1
Related insights
- More coming soon.
Important
The Healthier Score is not medical advice. It is a nutrition-based comparison score only. Always check the restaurant's latest nutrition, ingredients and allergen information before ordering.
Data caveats
Nutrition data is provided by restaurant brands and may change over time. Fibre is not always published. Where missing, a conservative fibre score is used.








