Brand Ranking
itsu vs wagamama vs Wasabi: Top Meals Compared
Brand-level comparison of itsu, wagamama and Wasabi based on average Healthier Score across their menus.
Brands are ranked by their average product score across all published meals. Minimum of three products per brand to be included.
Full ranking
| Rank | Chain | Avg Score /100 | Best Meal score | % scored 80+ | Meals analysed | Avg kcal | Avg protein (g) | Avg salt (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | itsuitsu | 70.1 | 85 | 12% | 68 | 390 | 17.8 | 2.56 |
| 2 | wagamamawagamama | 64.5 | 90 | 11% | 44 | 652 | 25.8 | 3.05 |
| 3 | wasabiwasabi | 60.9 | 81 | 2% | 52 | 429 | 15.5 | 3.20 |
Showing top 10 of qualifying chains. Lower-ranked chains may not appear if fewer than 3 meals qualify.
About this ranking
Includes only itsu, wagamama and Wasabi. Brand averages computed across all of their published, core-ranking products.
Methodology summary
The Healthier Score is a nutrition-based comparison score using published per-portion nutrition data.
Scores are combined using weighted averages. High levels of salt or saturated fat can cap the final score.
View full methodology →Watch-out key
- Salt highAbove 1.8g salt per serving
- Sat fat highAbove 5g saturated fat
- Fibre n/aFibre data not provided
- Score cappedScore reduced due to salt or sat fat
Meals per chain
How much menu we had to compare
- itsu68
- wagamama44
- wasabi52
Did you know?
A higher brand average means a higher chance of picking a balanced meal at random from the menu.
Related insights
- More coming soon.
Important
The Healthier Score is not medical advice. It is a nutrition-based comparison score only. Always check the restaurant's latest nutrition, ingredients and allergen information before ordering.
Data caveats
Nutrition data is provided by restaurant brands and may change over time. Fibre is not always published. Where missing, a conservative fibre score is used.