Hot Chicken Thai Rice Bowl
itsu
65/100Rank 32 of 56 in Rice Bowls
itsu · Rice Bowls

Hot Chicken Thai Rice Bowl

miso marinated chicken, wholegrain brown rice, vitamin packed greens & ginger, velvety Thai’spiced coconut sauce

Compare
657
kcal
37.7g
protein
12.1g
fibre
3.1g
sugar
4.23g
salt

Nutrition

Calories657 kcal
Protein37.7g
Carbohydrates44.7g
Sugars3.1g
Fat33.6g
Saturated fat18.2g
Fibre12.1g
Salt4.23g

Values shown per portion where available.

What's good about this meal

High proteinThis meal has 37.7g protein per portion.
25g+ proteinThis meal contains 37.7g protein per portion.
High fibreThis meal has 12.1g fibre per portion.
Lower sugarThis meal has 3.1g sugar per portion.

Watch-outs

Higher saltThis meal is higher in salt compared with many other options (4.23g per portion).
Higher saturated fatThis meal is higher in saturated fat compared with many other options (18.2g per portion).

Healthier Eats Score

The Healthier Score is a nutrition-based comparison score that ranks restaurant meals using published per-portion nutrition data: calories, protein, fibre, sugar, salt and saturated fat.

It does not assess ingredient quality, processing level, additives, cooking method, allergens or whether a meal is suitable for a specific diet.

65/100Healthier ScoreRank 32 of 56 in Rice Bowls
Final score
65/100
Raw weighted score
66
Category percentile
Rank 32 of 56 in Rice Bowls
Salt: 4.23g

Around 71% of the adult daily maximum. UK guidance says adults should have no more than 6g of salt per day. This product contains around 71% of that amount.

Score capped
  • Very high salt: this meal contains 4.2g salt, around 71% of the adult daily maximum. The final score is capped at 65.

Raw weighted score: 65.6. After caps, the final score is 65/100.

How this score is calculated

Each nutrient gets a 0-100 sub-score. Sub-scores are combined into a weighted average (the raw score). If a serving-level watch-out applies, the final score is capped.

How each sub-score was created

Each nutrient value is mapped onto a scoring curve. Where a value sits between two anchor points, the score is interpolated linearly.

Calories
Calories: 657 kcal
200kcal→45
400kcal→85
550kcal→100
650kcal→85
750kcal→60
900kcal→30
1100kcal→10

657 kcal sits between 650 kcal and 750 kcal. The score is interpolated between 85 and 60, giving a calorie sub-score of 83.3.

Protein
Protein: 37.7g

Protein is scored using both total grams and the share of calories from protein. The gram score contributes 60% and the protein-energy score contributes 40%.

Protein gram curve:
0g→0
15g→60
30g→100
Protein energy curve: 0% → 0, 20%+ → 100
Gram sub-score: 100
Energy sub-score: 100 (23% of calories from protein)
Blended protein sub-score = (gram × 0.60) + (energy × 0.40) = 100
Fibre
Fibre: 12.1g
0g→10
2g→35
4g→60
6g→85
8g→100

12.1g is at or above 8g, giving a fibre sub-score of 100.

Sugar
Sugar: 3.1g
5g→100
10g→80
15g→55
25g→25
50g→0

Lower sugar scores better. 3.1g is within the lowest sugar band (at or below 5g), so it receives a sugar sub-score of 100.

Salt
Salt: 4.23g (around 71% of the adult daily maximum of 6g)
1.5g→100
2g→80
2.4g→60
3g→40
4g→15
6g→0

Lower salt scores better. 4.23g sits between 4g and 6g. The score is interpolated between 15 and 0, giving a salt sub-score of 13.3.

Salt caps are separate from the salt sub-score. The sub-score contributes to the weighted average. A cap only limits the final score if salt is high enough and the raw score is above the cap.

Saturated fat
Saturated fat: 18.2g
3g→100
5g→75
7g→40
10g→15
20g→0

Lower saturated fat scores better. 18.2g sits between 10g and 20g. The score is interpolated between 15 and 0, giving a saturated fat sub-score of 2.7.

At a glance
  • Calories: 657 kcal → between 650 and 750 kcal → 83.3/100
  • Protein: 37.7g → blended grams + energy → 100/100
  • Fibre: 12.1g → ≥8g → 100/100
  • Sugar: 3.1g → ≤5g → 100/100
  • Salt: 4.23g → between 4 and 6g → 13.3/100
  • Saturated fat: 18.2g → between 10 and 20g → 2.7/100
Worked score calculation

Contribution = Sub-score x Weight. The raw score is the total contribution divided by the total weight (95).

NutrientSub-scoreWeightContribution
Calories83.3151,249.5
Protein100202,000.0
Fibre100151,500.0
Sugar100121,200.0
Salt13.318239.4
Saturated fat2.71540.5
Total956,229.4

Raw score = 6,229.4 / 95 = 65.6. After rounding and applying caps, the final Healthier Score is 65/100.

Cap calculation
  • Very high salt: this meal contains 4.2g salt, around 71% of the adult daily maximum. The final score is capped at 65.

Raw weighted score was 65.6. After caps, the final score is min(raw, cap) = 65/100.

Salt methodology

UK adults are advised to have no more than 6g salt per day. UK front-of-pack guidance treats more than 1.8g salt per portion as high for food portions over 100g. Healthier Eats uses these serving-level thresholds to decide when salt should limit the maximum score.

Read the full methodology

This is a nutrition-based comparison score for ranking restaurant meals against similar products. It is not a medical rating, ingredient-quality score or dietary advice. Always verify nutrition, ingredients and allergens with the restaurant before ordering.

What this score does not include

The Healthier Score is based on published nutrition values only. It does not currently assess ingredient quality, processing level, additives, cooking method, allergens or personal dietary suitability.

For example, two meals may have similar nutrition scores but differ in ingredients, processing or cooking method. Always check the restaurant's latest nutrition, ingredients and allergen information before ordering.

Allergens and dietary notes

Contains
sesamesoya
May contain
milkglutencelerymustardsulphur dioxide

Allergen information is for comparison only. Always check the official restaurant source before ordering.

Source

Sample data
Last checked: 18 Jul 2026
View official source

Related meals